| robert downey jr in tropic thunder :: watch family guy padre de familia |
| Author |
Message |
Harrison
Guest
|
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: chris brown rihanna sex tape |
|
|
It would not just be an economic collapse. It would be a collapse of modern civilizations. People don't seem to understand how vital oil is to the world as a whole. Oil isn't just used as a lube or to make fuel.
If you want to use the "general welfare" clause - which is in the constitution - to justify government health care, I would think food would come before health care on the list of things needed for life.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tanya
Guest
|
Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: rihanna herpes pictures |
|
|
|
“Fake.. Who quits at 12:15 anyways?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Limi
Guest
|
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
I think you mean "could have"...It's okay, lots of people fail that one..
Its not bad. I prefer the quattroporte. But honestly, I like a sports sedan to be incognito. Like an M5, or a amg mercedes (s, cls).!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Dalliessi/Fitiao
Guest
|
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: rihanna herpes pictures |
|
|
Yeah, why did Digg sellout with the damned background ads. My freaking eyes hurt. ***** EA.?
The concept of electrical propulsion has been around for years, but they have trouble working reliably. That's why commercial satellites still use electrothermal hydrazine thrusters (IMPEHT).I'm not saying they can't use electrical propulsion. It's just not a mature technology that currently only provides marginal propellant savings (on the order of like 10%).The article doesn't say much about how far away or what orbital slot the Japanese intend to position this space structure into. If they intend to beam power down 24/7, they'll need to be in a stable geosynchronous orbit. For commercial satellites, that's about 36,000 km away. Realistically, I don't think its possible to send up a single satellite with several square kilometres worth of stowed solar arrays to that altitude and still make it financially feasible. Ideally, you'd want it to stay up there long enough for a replacement to be build and well on its way plus a bit more to recoup your costs. So I would think 10 years minimum. The mass and the amount of propellant you'd need for station keeping are just too great for that. Just my opinion. Cheers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kendra
Guest
|
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: cartoon family guy sex |
|
|
Fitter. Happier.

|
|
| Back to top |
|
Elyn
Guest
|
Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: renee zellweger interview |
|
|
|
Big Hand / Little Hand -- Instant classic.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
CEISSMAN
Guest
|
Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: richard gere nationality |
|
|
|
That's a legitimate concern, but do you think the positive effect to the economy was worth the cost? What about the environmental benefit?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Jordy
Guest
|
Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: rihanna herpes pictures |
|
|
|
!
blowjobninjas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Robeela
Guest
|
that rabbit with the kid freaks me out |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|