This presentation seems a bit fishy to me. It seems more like a slide deck by Bill O'Reily on Islam.- If he was such an extremist, you think he'd use "Qur'an" instead of Koran. As a Muslim, I can tell you we love seeing that spelling as much as seeing "Moslem". Same goes for "Islamist" - taking an Arabic word and throwing an English suffix isn't classy.- Referring to other religions on slide 7 with -ism. We know Jews are called Jews, not Judaism(ists). Again, a bit over the top.- Slide 14 and devotion... "Koran, prayers, etc." is so unbelievably generic and vague, it seems like an Islamaphobe is trying to kick up a dust storm surrounding Karim Abdul Jabbar being Muslim. He's a balla and prays? Oh noes... to the gallows!- Slide 17's content seems to be taken off a Islamaphobe's glossary. The concept of abrogation (naskh) is much more complicating than quoting two ayat.- His utter lack of knowledge comes through again on slide 35, which makes me feel this presentation is from Jihad Watch on "How to Spot a Moslem". There are many kinds of abrogation and the majority opinion (since the time of the Prophet) is that the verses in the subsequent slides are not abrogated.- Using "Verse of the Sword" to refer to the ayah in Surat At-Tawba is again ridiculous. It's an orientalist term used to refer to 9:05 and a segway to 9:29. Muslims do not use this term as it's seen as a sign of Islamaphobia and ignorance about the religion. Again, the majority opinion is that these verses are not abrogates like he is referring to.- The Hadith on slide 45 isn't a link to "offensive Islam" at all. It's simply a list of events Muslims believe will happen before the Day of Judgment. From the books I have, there's no explanation from the scholars that "Muslims must do this, this and this..." in order for those events to take place. This link is about as strong as that comic showing the link between Iraq and Al-Qa'ida to be that they both have a Q.There's more than this, but this are the big things that stood out in my mind as I flipped through that deck. I am a bit suspicious in hearing about his alleged ties to radical clerics. If they were so strong, I'm surprised the FBI didn't swoop-in and grab him from the beginning. Many of my friends and family have been nabbed since 9/11 for simply going to mosques and hanging out together. This deck seems fabricated as well as the stories of him being a highly connected individual with radical imams in the Middle East. To me, it seems like someone's trying to fill the gaps of an already cloudy history so it sings the same tune Fox News headlines do.